Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wavepruner 2614 days ago
Many struggling artists I talk to want strong copyright laws. It's not just something rich corporations want.
4 comments

Struggling artists have virtually zero political pull. The laws are maintained by corporate interests.
They provide ideological cover and propaganda support fire. Every time there is anything controversial about music copyright, artists’ associations roll out spokespersons to justify the moves, because it plays well with their members.
Anyone can be a struggling artist. It takes no skill or ambition whatsoever. It's merely a poor economic choice and deserves no pity.
But the rights organizations, nominally artists guilds do have significant political pull.
Why? If someone like UMG or Disney steals their work do you really believe they will be treated fairly?
That's because they've been duped by the propaganda from those corporations into thinking they actually benefit from copyright.
And they probably do benefit from it...
Not more than they are harmed by the looting of the public domain that media conglomerates are engaging in. Having a small public domain hurts everyone who can't afford a legal team to research and litigate for them. When you weigh the heavy costs against the slight benefits, it's a net loss.
I know a few artists that suffered quite a lot of theft primarily in art assets and concept work including their work being used as concept art for commercial projects and textures and 3D models even shipping in with some.

Even in such cases like bargain bin games which were made by a Russian and Chinese studios and were published in Europe by fairly large publishers and used stolen assets they had little to no legal recourse the Publisher didn’t care, the artists don’t have the money to fight a legal battle and even if they do win at best they’ll barely cover their legal fees if they even turn a profit and the game devs would just patch those assets out if they would even exist by the time the case is settled.

From their point of view it’s not that the public domain is too small but that the current copyright laws are too lax and can only be used by those with large legal teams on retainers.

What you are talking about was already covered by the old copyright system. The new copyright system only adds protection against uploading the stolen work on an asset store.

Also the big publishers can now just submit your work to the copyright collectives and you will receive rakedowns on assets you own. Good luck proving that though.

I don't think any of the recent copyright reforms are going to solve the asymmetry in legal battles.
Just wanted to chime in that I agree with you. I had some artist friends who were pro strong copyright, but personally I don’t think they realize the vast groves of information everyone on earth is being deprived of for this scheme. We absolutely need to find ways to compensate artists but I think the cost of copyright is far too great.
Yes, there are always going to be useful idiots to buy legal solutions that mostly benefit existing institutions and lawyers