|
|
|
|
|
by jamesmcintyre
2623 days ago
|
|
8base looks really interesting and I'm glad you're filling a space which the Prisma folks left by reducing focus on graph.cool. One question, is your underlying platform currently (or to be) open source? I ask because it was reassuring when graph.cool put their entire graph.cool backend framework open source so that it felt even less like potential lock-in. I know the fact that it's standard graphql means there's already a certain level of portability but if you build-up all this functionality in your BaaS there's potentially a lot of lock-in there. Lastly, your pricing seems high for, say, a dev who's want to build a SaaS that'd sell to potentially many enterprise users. Maybe you do not want to target that demographic? |
|
1. We are evaluating an open source strategy, but currently don't have plans to open source it. There are couple ways we're addressing this. First, in an event of a closure of the platform we commit to open sourcing it, just like Parse did. Second, which is a more immediate one, is that we will be adding features that make 8base fit well into developer workflows as a tool rather than a platform. That way developers don't have to commit to building on 8base right away and can use it as an integration layer that accelerates access to business data and workflows. By focusing on enterprise use cases we believe we can achieve a good value proposition without forcing people to build entire application on 8base. Also, as serverless architecture becomes more pervasive porting business logic comprised of cloud functions should become easier than before (this is a somewhat weaker point).
2. We're still working on the pricing and gathering feedback. If you don't mind, could you share which aspects of pricing concern you specifically? Indeed a SaaS, especially one in the enterprise space, is definitely our target. As a matter of fact, we already have an enterprise SaaS built on 8base that's launching in a few months.