> do you think a physics degree or a statistics degree is better suited to doing data analysis, and why?
For finance, physics 100%. (The more experimental, the better.) When you're forced to map your theories to reality, and deal with the divergence, you develop an intuition for a certain set of problems. Those problems recur in commercial data science.
Reading through the thread, it looks like you believe that physicists can perform data analysis better than statisticians, because a physics program includes some stats courses.
For finance, physics 100%. (The more experimental, the better.) When you're forced to map your theories to reality, and deal with the divergence, you develop an intuition for a certain set of problems. Those problems recur in commercial data science.