[yters]

Yes, if they could establish an objective threshold that'd be great. Probably simplest is to restrict to actual threats.

But, someone saying transgenderism might be a mental disorder is not a threat, so should not be banned. Likewise saying capitalism has led to overpopulation, environmental destruction and cultural imperialism is not a threat and should not be banned, regardless of whether it is true or not.

I also think some sort of enforcement of etiquette that is content agnostic would be great, but that's a bit trickier to draw the line.