[areyouseriousxx]

I feel as though this piece is a bit alarmist, but I'm curious if we are approaching the first big test of these ownership structures of public companies where the founder(s) maintain majority power.

Up until now, Facebook has consistantly provided excellent returns for investors, and this has also allowed other companies, like Snap, to have similar shareholder voting rights. Investors have yet to penalize a company at their IPO or overall stock price for this practice, but I wonder if we may see a change in that attitude if Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook's other shareholders start to have significant public disagreements.