|
|
|
|
|
by metildaa
2621 days ago
|
|
Doubtful, T-Mobile has shown it is quite profitable without Sprint, taking on Sprint's debt and assets will force T-Mobile to act like a classic telecom company much moreso than they already do. T-Mobile is only interested in buying Sprint for their 120Mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum, as they would be able to use that to build a 5G network with much wider spacing (similar to Clearwire's spacing every 16 blocks) versus Verizon and AT&T who will need to place radios every 2 to 3 blocks using mmWave spectrum (and mmWave won't work indoors either). Sprint and T-Mobile could easily come to a network sharing agreement where T-Mobile builds out 2.5Ghz and Sprint can use the network, similar to Telus/Bell in Canada. This would be a much more reasonable option than merging and losing the only carrier (Sprint) that has consistently provided downward pressure on cell plan prices. |
|
That is not a sustainable competitive position in a capital intense industry.
Spectrum is part of the deal but hardly the only one. Retail consolidation would be a big cost savings. Refinancing Sprint's debt ($40B) with T-Mobile's better credit ratings would save hundreds of millions per year in interest expenses. CAQ for mobile customers is very high, so Sprint's customer base is worth quite a bit.
The really important question is how the deal will affect the competitive landscape for 5G. Neither Sprint or T-Mobile have the scale to effectively compete on 5G and Sprint in particular is in bad shape due to their low credit ratings and high borrowing costs. If T-Mobile doesn't merge with Sprint, either a larger company does, or Sprint continues to circle the drain with low-value services and slowly dies.
If Sprint loses customers then all else being equal this benefits AT&T/Verizon more because, if those customer migrate in proportion to existing market share, they get more of them. So Sprint going down weakens T-Mobile's competitive position.
Whether or not merging with Sprint actually improves T-Mobile's competitive position depends on execution but there is at least a plausible story there.
At this stage of the industry the opportunities for competition at the infrastructure level are limited and regulators should be focused more on maintaining a competitive market for MVNOs that are offering differentiated products like Google Fi and cheap pre-paid options like Mint.