[nerdjon]

I wish I could say I was surprised by this... but I am not.

What I am really curious about, are any of these companies linked to Apple?

Considering the very public stance they have been recently taking. The article does not specifically mention them either way (and they are the only of the big ones missing).

[SlowRobotAhead]

Not sure about Apple but I like that all the companies linked are all supporters of NN. Almost as if a public face, NN, and a private face, think tanks to overturn privacy laws.

[nerdjon]

I wouldn't necessarily tie net neutrality and this together, since NN supports them as much as us. Considering it most likely would be them footing the bill (or loosing traffic) without NN

[SlowRobotAhead]

>I wouldn't necessarily tie net neutrality and this together, since NN supports them as much as us.

How we know? Because they told us that? They would be funding thinktanks to pass NN if they had to. The truth about NN is only ONCE was a carrier ever really found to be selectively throttling for non-congestion reasons in the mid-2000s and the FCC shut that down immediately. NN still allows for throttling if you claim it's for congestion.

YET... SV likes to promote the idea of a slow internet without regulation.

Just because you agree with the idea doesn't mean you shouldn't pay attention to the propaganda.