|
|
|
|
|
by Retra
2623 days ago
|
|
It's not altogether unsurprising though. Most religions tend to align themselves with the notion that "being a good person" is the same as "developing your public status as a good person", (in that the mechanisms they'll employ for self-correction don't make any distinction between the two) and westerners looking to ancient eastern philosophy for answers have always played right into that game. Alternatively, every good idea that came from Buddhism doesn't need to be a Buddhist idea to be a good idea, so there's no point in selling good ideas using Buddhism unless you're trying to promote the bad ideas as well. Good ideas stand on their quality of impact, not on the quality of their source. |
|
I also find that in the West, most people go about religion by finding that which fits the lifestyle they already have. Very few are willing to sacrifice anything meaningful or make serious changes to fit a religion's teachings. It is much easier for them to find the sect of X religion that also allows them to Y and Z.