[rhmw2b]

You could argue that is happening in a sense. However, they make it clear up front what behavior is expected and what the results of breaking the code of conduct is. This is not dissimilar to any employment relationship. My employer could fire me for things I do during my personal time that are not consistent with their standards, so I have a financial intensive to conform to their code of conduct. Additionally, I have an obligation to not do work or accept payment for things that I believe are morally or ethically wrong, even if it is offered by my employer and it is substantial.

The difference is where the line is drawn (what the code of conduct requires). My opinion is that the low tuition costs are not reason enough to say that the school is coercing students to live a puritan lifestyle.