|
|
|
|
|
by sametmax
2627 days ago
|
|
You assume software is perfect and people don't make mistake. Breaking compat on accident happens. Bad pushes and releases exist. Unpatched bugs in latest. Wrong deployments. Semver make it easier to spot/prevent mistakes by giving you more granular information. It's not like it's a data overload, so "too much info" as argument is really weird. Purity in computing is a terrible master. |
|
Semver would be what? Tests should catch it. Mine or yours.
> Bad pushes and releases exist.
Semver would be what? Tests should catch it. Mine or yours.
> Unpatched bugs in latest.
Semver would be what? Tests should catch it. Mine or yours.
> Wrong deployments.
Semver would be what? Tests should catch it. Mine or yours.
> Semver make it easier to spot/prevent mistakes by giving you more granular information.
None of those things are fixed by semver. What is the point of semver again?
The only thing I, as a user, give any crap about is breaking change. i.e. major version numbers.
So why not just have one or two levels?