Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hrez 2630 days ago
If it's that much churn, wouldn't it make sense to point new writes/updates to B2 and let s3 naturally drain/lifecycle out its data?
1 comments

Probably a technically better solution but it would not make as good of a PR piece as an epic migration.
Actually I think it would sound better - "How to move 23TB without moving (almost) anything". Especially to technical people.