Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
hrez
2630 days ago
If it's that much churn, wouldn't it make sense to point new writes/updates to B2 and let s3 naturally drain/lifecycle out its data?
1 comments
dgemm
2630 days ago
Probably a technically better solution but it would not make as good of a PR piece as an epic migration.
link
amenod
2630 days ago
Actually I think it would sound better - "How to move 23TB without moving (almost) anything". Especially to technical people.
link