[RobertRoberts]

No, there has not been any studies done on the "efficacy" of vaccines.

You misread something. Your link is about "adverse reactions", my statement was about "efficacy".

>There's not been one single peer reviewed double blind test done on the _efficacy_ of vaccines

[anoncake]

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/1279

1 minute of googling.

[RobertRoberts]

None of those studies controlled who was exposed to the disease. This is unethical by modern standards and is stated as a comment in your link.

Notice the results from the study in Asia: (your link)

>"25 (2.5%) of 1017 infants assigned to receive vaccine and 20 (2.0%) of 1018 assigned to receive placebo had a serious adverse event within 14 days of any dose.

The most frequent serious adverse event was pneumonia (vaccine 12 [1.2%]; placebo 15 [1.5%])."

The infants getting the vaccine vs placebo within 14 days had almost identical results.

[anoncake]

...when it comes to adverse effects. In other words, the researchers could not find any side effects.

[RobertRoberts]

Can you show me where is says they found no side effects?

[anoncake]

In the sentences that you fucking quoted.

[RobertRoberts]

>...the researchers could not find any side effects.

The phrase "side effects" is not anywhere in my quote.