[AWildC182]

1) Ignoring actual question, electrics will likely benefit from flying extremely high as the motors don't care about atmosphere. Fuel burn won't really matter here though.

2) GA certification has sunk so many companies it's become a running joke. It's entirely fair to question their approach of using a heavily modded Lancair Legacy with an ipad for EFIS/EMS.

3) Yea, but again, they said they want to use an iPad as primary EFIS. Seems like a good way to piss off the FAA to me...

Enjoy your 20 mile finals :)

[bluGill]

Motors rely on air for cooling, so they do care about atmosphere. Propellers rely on air density to "push". I don't know how this plays out in the real world, but atmosphere matters.

[AWildC182]

Motors came be 99% efficient, compared to ICE at 20%. Cooling isn't that huge of a deal. If a wing can operate at a given altitude you can design electric propulsion that will also work there. The U2 operated on a turbine at 70,000ft. A turbine is just a very complicated prop at the end of the day so in theory a large cord/diameter prop or a high speed ducted fan would also work. The actual altitudes were're talking about for GA are far lower though. Most GA aircraft top out below 18,000. Electrics will likely prefer operating at 20,000+.

[outworlder]

Not sure if the 99% figure is correct, but it is certainly above 80%. Electric motors run quite cold compared to motors that are burning things. Cooling is unlikely to matter.

Now, wouldn't the cold air at higher altitudes present a much bigger problem for the battery? FL20 and up you can easily reach temperatures where current batteries are no longer usable.

[YUMad]

90% is the usual assumption.

[module0000]

I imagine the electric "bonus" at higher altitudes would be similar to a turbo prop's bonus. You can get more efficiency at higher altitudes, but it all goes away if you climb further.

[Tuxer]

Hehe I also fly a super decathlon for aerobatics. 0.3mile finals! ;)

For a VFR aircraft I don't mind an iPad-type device for nav. I did my initial training on a 6pack 152 and I was fine with that.

I'm mostly interested (and they've remained silent) on their choice of avionics for the IFR eFlyer4. I'd kill for a G1000...

[AWildC182]

Just finishing a decathlon checkout. They're awesome :)

The ipad could be fine if they have some simple steam backups (compass, ASI, altimeter). IFR it would not be a good idea though. G1000 would be awesome though!

[outworlder]

> Ignoring actual question, electrics will likely benefit from flying extremely high as the motors don't care about atmosphere. Fuel burn won't really matter here though.

One bad thing for manufacturers is that they won't be able to segment their market by adding a turbo :)