|
|
|
|
|
|
by servilio
2622 days ago
|
|
|
> Compile speed, not compiling the same dependencies all over the time. Sounds like caching these would be a simpler but solution. > Many commercial use cases require distribution of binary libraries
[...] Good use case, and in this case another cache would solve the issue as well. Defining a protocol for binary caches and being able to add your own could solve this very well. The same solution could help solve the previous one too. BTW, if you are in either case, have you looked into Nipxkgs[1]? They might be able to do both, the basic capabilities are there, not sure if the Rust infrastructure[2] already provides it. [1] https://nixos.org/nixpkgs
[2] https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#users-guide-to-the-rust-in... |
|
|