Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fxbl0i 2623 days ago
There are many more biographies of males than of females on Wikipedia. Whatever the reason for that might be is up to debate.
1 comments

Is this good or bad? Maybe because (assumption here) there are more "relevant" males throughout history?
It is not good or bad, it is what it is. Unless biographies of females are actively being suppressed, it is simply irrelevant: they are not being created because nobody cares, literally.