[kadendogthing]

I use netlify for about 6 out of 7 sites I manage for myself and family. The last one I have on linode purely out of laziness.

Netlify absolutely kills it with their entire suite of offerings. I highly highly recommend people try it out if they haven't yet.

[hombre_fatal]

I was blown away by how polished it was once I finally tried it a few months ago. I set up auto-deploy on push to Github + build command in like two clicks for all of my projects and never looked back.

Their free tier is probably too generous though. I know someone running the biggest website in a massive niche and they are serving their SPA for free from Netlify.

[frosted-flakes]

Well, without their free tier they probably wouldn't be as big as they are today. It's the same model as freemium apps: get big, then start charging.

[hombre_fatal]

You justified a free tier but not why it's still free for one of the most trafficked websites in the world. ;)

[kamkha]

Their free tier has a 100GB/month bandwidth cap — surely the most trafficked websites in the world would very quickly hit that limit, no?

Your point stands nonetheless — they could certainly be losing money on certain large users of their free tier. Serving relatively static content has gotten extremely cheap across the board, though, and like the parent said, they might be benefiting from the pricing by more indirect means.

[graemebenzie]

Aren't they just burning through VC cash as they suck up all the devs?

[kadendogthing]

They probably get away with a lot since these sites are static. Static sites are a wonderful thing indeed.