|
|
|
|
|
|
by ben_w
2632 days ago
|
|
|
> How is this any different from Facebook? Primarily because we’ve been telling them they need to do a better job about this for years, so “could not reasonably have been predicted“ absolutely does not apply. They have literally been condemned by a United Nations investigator for what happened in Myanmar [1]. Multiple government have been unhappy with their attitude problem [2]. In this report, one of the problems is they “continue to host and publish the mosque attack video”, which they absolutely don’t have any excuse for not being aware of, not any more. If this is the best that the state of the art can manage, then the state of the art is not good enough for Facebook to continue to exist. If Facebook were a human, it would have been fired for gross negligence. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/mar/13/myanmar-u... [2] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/oct/31/uk-and-ca... |
|
|