| > Don’t you think they would, for example, be able to prioritize content based on reputation/hidden metrics? What you're proposing is discrimination and isn't a solution. > Don’t you think, for example, that a fair amount of videos categories can be auto filtered with extremely high accuracy? No, not really, but please provide some examples. I'm assuming you mean content category, not literal tagged category, in which case you can't really distinguish between someone livestreaming in their car vs. the Christchurch shooter driving up to the mosque. > Don’t you think, for example, that if they had enough content moderators they would have been able to stop the stream and to take down this video faster? Sure, but they already have many thousands of moderators in addition to automated systems in place today. It's inevitable that unless every post is hand-reviewed by a human that some objectionable content will slip through. I get that your point is that FB and the other big tech companies can certainly afford to be doing more than they currently are, but to the extent that we would almost certainly be in this exact same position even if they had hired your proposed 50,000 moderators there's not much substance to your proposal that I can even reduce. |