|
|
|
|
|
|
by mfarris
2637 days ago
|
|
|
The article isn't misleading at all. She is a company executive. Female executives getting fired for pregnancy is not unusual in the entertainment industry. It's disgusting, but not unusual. And HR is always eager to help the scumbag boss cover it up. |
|
|
A person with senior managerial responsibility in a business organization. Suitable or appropriate for a senior business executive[0]
The actual content was a bit of a surprise/different than my expectations based on the title but may not have been intentionally misleading. Consider this article title:
Top Manager fired from Facebook, alleges pregnancy discrimination
With the content being something like:
Alice, a top project manager in charge of development for an upcoming internal tool for Spanish speaking Facebook employees, alleges her termination was due to discrimination.
Again, pregnancy discrimination is dumb from a legal standpoint, a cultural/employee motivation standpoint, a PR standpoint and generally just bad practice all around. I am simply discussing how the article title seems to frame this as a higher level Netflix internal problem when it seems likely this is just one bad actor who had autonomy over a project and abused his authority.
[0]https://www.google.com/search?q=Dictionary#dobs=executive