[myWindoonn]

E [0] doesn't have classes or inheritance. It has messages and message-passing, and objects are genuinely encapsulated.

A cousin comment notes that true objects are often called "actors". This is fine, but people who do this without an understanding of this history may come to miss out entirely on objects, only seeing what Erlang and Elm have to offer and not E.

As a hint, try removing the meme entirely from your inventory for a bit: For the next week, whenever you think or say "object-oriented", interrupt yourself and instead think about what specific language feature, be it classes or inheritance or whatever, you actually wanted to reference.

[0] http://erights.org/