[tluyben2]

I guess it depends on how much a stickler for rules the particular tech is? I had a laptop replaced which did not have waterdamage but did have the indicators activated; the guy asked me; ‘did any fluids spill over this?’ I said no and he gave me a new laptop. I had an iPad which definitely had no water damage either (I was the only user) but that one was refused because the indicators were triggered. Those things are flawed and this process is/was flawed, so now I simply have insurance that covers whatever: saves thinking about it.

[eridius]

Water damage indicators are known to not be perfect. That's unfortunate but true. It doesn't mean Apple is deliberately making them be bad in order to avoid warranty replacements though.

[tluyben2]

No, agreed. So in really humid weather, say, HK in the summer, the keyboard of the Pro breaks randomly if you do not care it in a watertight pouch and the indicators trigger. Not waterdamage as Apple means it to be and I have not had issues with replacements there but you wonder what the purpose of the indicators is then.