|
|
|
|
|
by ddeokbokki
2634 days ago
|
|
> Anyone who conducts a business conversation over any medium but snail mail, fax, email or the phone deserves whatever misfortune befalls them. That's going against progress, just like some people were against electronic communication for business transactions when they were first introduced. I understand where you are coming from, texts are familiar, but more and more business run solely on messaging platforms and rely on texts to conduct business. |
|
I've seen people fire off the first thing that comes to mind in a text message in a business setting and almost always realize they weren't as precise as they wanted to be and have to attempt to correct themselves with follow on messages. This mistake and ensuing retraction almost always sours the deal.
Edit: addendum (I'm aware I'm doing exactly what I just made a case against)
Mine, and the Court's right now, expectation is that written communication does not need to be immediate. And since you have a chance to think through what you'd like to write, your first message has no reason not to be precise and correct to your intentions.