|
|
|
|
|
|
by dijksterhuis
2636 days ago
|
|
|
Something ridiculous like 90% of arXiv papers get lost in the sheer volume of submissions - 90% of it could be wrong (that's a made up number, sue me). Just like flat earth or anti-vaxer theories on YouTube, incorrectly published work could be damaging and dangerous. Getting peer-reviewed & published legitimizes the research work. It has been verified by a panel of experts. Good for those start ups. I can't wait to attack all their Deep Learning APIs [1]. [1] https://openai.com/blog/adversarial-example-research/ |
|
|