[takinola]

The style of this article is really disingenuous. The new leadership at NPM may (or may not) be acting disrespectfully to the terminated workers but to go from that to speculating about their financial health just seems unwarranted. The statement "a company which may, or may not have financial problems" is meaningless. Every company in the world "may, or may not," have financial problems. That sentence only serves to impute doubt about the company's viability while skirting the limits of truthfulness

[xkcd-sucks]

It seems to skirt the limits of a nondisclosure agreement, not truth. Also, analysts infer financial health from terminations, which probably has a larger effect on the company's success.