Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by danbard 2643 days ago
It seems that an excellent predictor of policy in SF is: will it increase inequality and the advantage of the very rich while being presented with liberal rhetoric? Then do it. This is a great way to keep smart but poor kids from competing with private school kids.
2 comments

This is also across the board in most California districts. Not just SF. (This article is dated 2016)

I posted this because in our Bay Area school district, algebra and geometry was an accelerated course with just 35 students. (In just one school of the district) Selected by lottery.

It costs 7500/year but they want to get rid of it. Teachers are also planning to strike. To me, it looks like funding in CA public schools is no longer about education but about the care and feeding of public sector unionized employees.

Parents are horrified but in the same neighborhood thread, teachers are using it to ask the parents to support them. Students are given extra credit if they show their support for work the rule(only school work hours and no more clubs and extra classes like this) and strikes and walk outs.

It’s all mind blowing to me(I don’t have kids in the public school system) and I can’t wrap my mind around this. I have been approached by friends who are parents and don’t want to be vocal about their kids children in the community forums as I don’t have the vulnerabilities of parents whose kids are already in the system.

Certain Asian/Indian parents send their kids to tutoring classes which is seen as elitist and reactions have been borderline racist.

I just tell my friends to pull their kids from public school if they can afford it or homeschool them. I am very impressed with khan academy. I looked into it and I find myself learning from their classes.

I have to ask ...what is the point of public education in CA anymore? Should educational methods change and the way we teach subjects change? Conformity is tyranny at this point.

Teachers overload kids with useless assignments and the real learning happens after school in tutoring centers. And then the kids have to learn extra curricular subjects especially as they get closer to applying for universities. This is supposed to make them ‘well rounded’ but it only makes them depressed, stressed and uninterested in education. They become cynical and jaded and entirely unprepared when they go to college. It’s worse for the smart kids as they are bored but still have to go through the motions.

Maybe it’s time to revamp public education.

California has made home schooling more difficult than most states. The cynic in me says that it’s done that way on purpose to protect the position of the public school employees.
Which school district are you referring to? We are looking for a competitive, challenging school district without a suicide problem.
Since the graduates of SF public schools are expected to leave the city and make room for wealthier folks, the use they will still have for the city is as ambassadors of San Francisco's political views to the rest of the country, where they will be able to afford to live.
Glibly, metastasized leftists.

I think that’s the most natural model for a virtue-signaling economic sinkhole that can’t sustain a viable population, but is trying to spread its governance ideas anyway: it’s literally analogous to unhealthy cells using false signaling to sinkhole resources while replicating their damaged DNA — a cancer.

It’s not just SF: Seattle, NYC, and basically every major metro that subscribes to particular left-wing ideas.

For the perspective on Seattle: https://youtu.be/bpAi70WWBlw