Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
dajonker
2637 days ago
It is not, you can check the post for the full context.
2 comments
gadgetoid
2637 days ago
Or, better still, an Archive.org snapshot of the commit that added this very code:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190331195338/bitbucket.org/pip...
(As a resident geek, I was asked to look into this by a friend)
link
aasasd
2637 days ago
For good measure, the commit seems to be removed from the original repo.
link
ivanhoe
2637 days ago
It's pretty much the same as if it was hardcoded, it drops all tables that have a name starting with the WP prefix. It's extremely ugly, but it's not unsafe (if your plan is removing all WP related tables from the DB).
link
(As a resident geek, I was asked to look into this by a friend)