[akarki15]

> Thinking as a Martian, if humans were to decide to trust everyone a minimum amount, such that no human had no trust, but every human had some trust, and that amount of trust was sufficient for everyone to obtain a minimum amount of access to the resources necessary for life, then everything would change.

This is looking at human beings from a personal standpoint. You have to look at humans as a group and decide what the Nash equilibrium looks like. If everyone tried to trust a minimum amount, there is a large incentive on single individual to break that trust and gain benefits. You need some kind of system to dis incentivize people from breaking trust. Guess what that's what law and order is. But unfortunately nations haven't been able to agree on common international law because the Nash equilibrium in the group of nations happens to be different.

While I applaud the optimism of the writer, the piece is too rosy and void of facts/theoretical framework for me to appreciate it.