Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ivoras 2644 days ago
Which is a bit bizarre because FeeeBSD jails were world's first containers on a vaguely desktop-ish unix-ish systems.

The crowd just never had the hype power of Linux and no big player took to developing cool things on top.

It just shows you that having a technically good solution is irrelevant if there's no marketing behind it.
4 comments
ignoramous 2644 days ago
> no big player took to developing cool things on top.

Just one data-point, but WhatsApp engineering was adamant that FreeBSD was a key precursor that allowed them to scale 2m+ connections per host on their (rather beefy) boxes: https://youtu.be/TneLO5TdW_M

> It just shows you that having a technically good solution is irrelevant.

True. I've seen many promising projects die/stagnate at the hands of unpopularity, *BSDs wouldn't be the first. Sigh.

link
tannhaeuser 2644 days ago
It maybe also shows how brainwashed or resume-oriented the tech crowd is.
link
lima 2644 days ago
Network effects are real though.
link
pjmlp 2644 days ago
I remember using Tru64 and HP-UX containers before any BSD got them.
link
inferiorhuman 2643 days ago
And Solaris zones. But FreeBSD is far more desktop oriented than anything Sun or HP put out (and yes I ran Solaris as a desktop OS for a bit, but still).
link
stingraycharles 2644 days ago
Exactly, Docker was able to get a lot of traction because of a variety of reasons (timing and usability, to name a few), even though from a technical perspective it's very much a suboptimal implementation.

And right now you just have a huge network effect around containers + linux: the tooling + support is the most compelling reason to "suck it up" and just fire up Ubuntu and call it a day.

link