|
|
|
|
|
by dragontamer
2647 days ago
|
|
401k plans have huge society inefficiencies. If someone dies early, the 2 or 3 million they save up in a 401k plan is wasted. Pension plans can capture that inefficiency and provide superior value over 401k plans as a result. Annuities try to bridge the gap. But I admit that I don't know too much about them. Stocks and stuff are nice. But what happens if you die early or outlive your savings? At an individual level, you cannot plan such a thing. But a decent annuity company can provide value by smoothing out that kind of variance. Pensions were a combination of stock plans + annuities. The main issue with Pensions is that people live a LOT longer today than they used to 40 years ago: medicine has gotten much better. So most pension plans (including Social Security) have underestimated how much they need to pay out. "Fortunately", the American life expectancy is dropping due to the opioid crisis. So maybe things will be a bit better for pensions / annuities / Social Security than we expected just 5 years ago. |
|
Annuities can 100% bridge the gap. The problem is most Americans are financially illiterate, this stuff (401ks, annuities, how much to save) is too complicated for them and most people are too impulsive and consumerist to save enough.
So 401ks/annuities are better on a societal level assuming prudent savvy employees, which is a completely false assumption.