|
|
|
|
|
by PeterisP
2643 days ago
|
|
Part of the reason is not bureaucratic but that clinical testing simply takes enormous amounts of labor, since you need to do it at a large scale. Alternatively, you could say that the requirement to do that much clinical testing is an arbitrary bureaucratic decision and could be lowered - but there are political reasons (e.g. thalidomide) to err on the side of caution even if extra testing saves less lives than it costs lives because of the delays. |
|