|
|
|
|
|
by hnhg
5678 days ago
|
|
Think of the index fund as reducing the risk of depending on any one stock for your gains. I don't know what the distribution of gains is like on an index fund but an answer to your question would likely come from an examination of one. |
|
I have not seen any comparative table of stock churn rates for different funds, but my guess is that index funds do well because they reduce the sell-buy transaction costs, partly by eliminating the cost of human stock pickers, but primarily by reducing the percentage of stocks in the fund that are sold then bought every year. Maybe this is wrong?
My understanding is that an index fund sells and buys stocks to balance the proportions held in the fund as the market capitalisation of the companies changes inside the index. This imposes an apparently unnecessary cost on the fund. If we removed this cost by not selling and buying stocks to keep it equal to the index would the fund become more profitable? I am considering it to be a fund where people invest incrementally over a long period so there would be constant random aquisition of new stocks from the index.
Maybe that doesn't make sense for some reason.