|
|
|
|
|
by jrudolph
2646 days ago
|
|
The point made by OP is not so much about the technology but about drawing parallels between the history of and hopes held for both projects. Both OpenStack and K8s were/are hyped as solutions to reduce vendor lock-in, although they do so in different ways. The parallels between the two are startling, i.e. at the beginning of OpenStack vendors tried to differentiate themselves by solving distribution/installation and plug-ins/integrations. How many K8s distros/installers are out there right now? Countless... [0] provides an interesting angle to the discussion that vendors trying their best to differentiate themselves is what ultimately led to the demise of OpenStack. I'm so far optimistic the same won't happen to K8s. Google is investing into K8s as a vehicle to gravitate workloads to GCP, but in order to do so it has to maintain some level of compatibility to other cloud vendors. 0: https://aeva.online/2019/03/what-happened-to-openstack/ |
|