|
|
|
|
|
|
by urgoroger
2647 days ago
|
|
|
What I was trying to communicate was that the Turing machine believed to represent the limits of what is physically possible. So then you have turing machines >= brain (since a brain is physical)
and
brain >= turing machine (by simulation argument) The conclusion is the brain and Turing machine can do the same thing (brain = turing machine). |
|
|
Another religious tenet with no observable basis.
Where did so many hackers get this misconception that computable and physically possible are proven to be the same? Many claim the Church-Turing thesis shows this. Have they never read it carefully?