Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by senderista 2637 days ago
That doesn’t sound like “at-most-once”. What if your consumer crashed after processing the message but before committing the offset?
1 comments

This is a fair thing to point out. For us the “at-most-once” guarantee was based on committing. Luckily our processing was idempotent so in the rare case of the above scenario it wouldn’t cause any duplication