[sweetheart]

I can’t help but feel that in some ways, an “artistic” ad is even worse than one that doesn’t try to appeal so strongly to aestheticism for the sake of beauty. It’s somehow more deceptive and insidious to me. I don’t think the founders adhere to much of an ethical code if they are commissioned for any ads.

[cwkoss]

Elevating advertising with art cheapens the art. Mona lisa would be ugly garbage its intention was to sell insurance.

[gumby]

La Jaconde/Mona Lisa it was funded to promote the glory of François 1er.