|
|
|
|
|
|
by tzs
2654 days ago
|
|
|
> It's even more unhealthy if I can't have an informed discussion about the news of the day with you because you got your news from the NYT and I got my news from Times of London and we got two entirely different sides of the story and we can't go and see each other's sources of information Probably not the best example. With the NYT and the Times of London, you might get different perspectives on a news story (as opposed to an opinion piece), but they will both be mostly correct. You should be able to have informed discussion. To make your example work, you need something more like an AlterNet reader trying to have an informed discussion with an InfoWars reader. |
|
|