|
|
|
|
|
by andrewmccall
5677 days ago
|
|
What separates this from continuous integration. As I understand it the article proposes testing the same build over and over again, well the same commit rebuilt and retested over and over again. Where do you benefit from this? I could see a situation where tests running against a live system would be worthwhile, this is what I though when I saw the title. |
|
Continuous testing happens on every save. You safe a file, it gets synced with another machine, the build happens there. If the build succeeds, tests run and you get immediate feedback on whether you broke anything.