|
|
|
|
|
|
by gbrown
2647 days ago
|
|
|
It's still really convoluted and removed from the actual elephant. From a frequentist perspective, the elephant either is or is not on the table, and if it is then it has a certain size - not random quantities subject to probabilistic statements. If you're willing to treat probability as a measure of uncertainty, then you'd be right at home as a Bayesian. |
|
|