|
|
|
|
|
by xcthulhu
5684 days ago
|
|
>No one uses ramified type theory these days, at least not that I am aware In the 1920s Frank Ramsey proved that the theory of ramified types + "The Axiom of Reducibility" is equivalent to the theory of simple types:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory#Simple_theory_of_ty... The history I've heard is that ramified types were abandoned after this, since simple type theory is easier and has the same expressive power. |
|
José Ferreirós in The Princeton Companion to Mathematics mentions his name as well, albeit without much detail. Chwistek seems a fascinating character: like his contemporary Witkacy, he was an artist as well as a logician, and according to the biography of Alfred Tarski by the Fefermans [2], was appointed to a professorship at Lvov in 1930 which Tarski was also in the running for; apparently a letter of recommendation from Russell was the decisive factor (see p. 67 of the aforementioned).
Bernard Linsky seems to have written a chapter on Chwistek and type theory in The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. You can read the first page [3] but I haven't been able to find the entire thing online.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Chwistek
[2] http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=052...
[3] http://www.springerlink.com/content/v078l3n714589036/