Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mcguire 2654 days ago
It's "free" because the cost is built into the hardware---MS had licensing terms that made selling hardware without a license a poor choice. As a result, it was preinstalled and no one looked at any alternatives.
1 comments

In the context of the GP's post, that is free. The user did not have to outlay any more money to acquire it.
It wasn't free: the user was forced to pay for it built-in to cost of the machine even if they intended to use a different OS. That's much worse than free.