|
|
|
|
|
|
by wgjordan
2657 days ago
|
|
|
> actions? I think this is speaking for itself: [link] The link is to a packaged, binary distribution of the 'OSS only' features, the assertion was regarding 'significant intermingling of proprietary code into the code base'. The two are not the same. Also, from the release notes linked to from that page, Amazon's assertion that 'neither release notes nor documentation make it clear what is open source and what is proprietary' does appear to be valid. |
|
|
Which is a wrong assertion, you can clearly see that it is an under Licence feature by the X-pack mention: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/curr... above the name of the feature.