Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by toomuchtodo 2657 days ago
Which is why you don’t host it on AWS. Wrong tool for the job.
2 comments

Their Github page specifically mentions AWS S3 as a requirement. So they are using it.
It mentions "AWS S3 or compatible service". The S3 API is a de facto standard for object storage services, and there are numerous implementations of it.
(Including many which you can easily self-host like Minio, for those who are following along at home and weren't sure whether that was just limited to other cloud services)
Is there a cheaper S3 alternative that you recommend or that Mozilla's likely using instead?
I think Backblaze's cloud storage is the cheapest I've seen. Microsoft and Google would also be a bit cheaper than S3
As you mentioned, huge fan of Backblaze B2. No affiliation, just a satisfied customer. Can also pair it with Cloudflare for even less expensive traffic serving.

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-and-cloudflare-part...

But it's not s3 compatible.