|
|
|
|
|
by YeGoblynQueenne
2659 days ago
|
|
(also posted above- wasn't getting a reply link). But, I'm a human being. Why do I need to show you my representation to convince you I possess human understanding of language? Conversely, to claim that a statistical model possesses understanding is a very strong claim that requires equally strong evidence. And since we can inspect a statistical model's representation- that is where the evidence should be sought. reply |
|
Why not? What makes you special? You're giving humans a double standard here. It's not like we have a particularly clear understanding of the human model of cognition.
And since we're venturing further into the philosophical, I feel safe making the assertion that no, I, a priori, have no reason to believe that you have more understanding of language than a model. I'm only interacting with you online. For all I know, you are a computer program. Why should I trust you and hold you to a different standard than I would any other model?