|
|
|
|
|
by dalbasal
2661 days ago
|
|
This kind of echoes what Jaron Lanier has been proposing. I think they get at something true, in terms of moral sentiment, but I don't understand how it would be implmented. How do you set prices? How does this lead to better incentives and outcomes, rather than a scheme where people can get $4 a year and the industry gets a moral blank cheque. Currently, our Google & FBs data is being monetized mostly via ad-targetting, or via (for example) optimizing the FB newsfeed algorithim so that you spend more time on FB, where they can put that ad-targetting data to work. Google's captcha-powered self driving cars demonstrates a point, but at least for now, the value of data is mostly ad-related (or business/political/military/police intelligence, which overlaps with ad-targetting in worrying ways). Paying consumers to be advertized to ... isn't that a black mirror premise? As of now, I'm more inclined to the "make-the-data-public" direction. For democracy concerns, for example, it would be valuable if the public could |
|