|
|
|
|
|
by throwawaymath
2651 days ago
|
|
Regardless of whether or not it's useful, it's substantially plagiarized from another source. You don't have an inline citation or visual indication that many of the figures are copied from another article on the topic. The same goes for copying paragraphs with extremely minimal modifications. Slightly changing sentence structure is not paraphrasing or stating in your own words. Pointing a reader to an article for further reading is not the same as a citation. To put it bluntly, your arrangement of the material, substantial paragraphs, and a significant number of your figures/graphics are copied from elsewhere without citation. |
|
Providing links billed as additional reading material doesn’t count as a citation.