[Zooper]

I'm confused, why would a small set of people with time on their hands be able to compromise a liquid democracy? Are there not workarounds to the problems encountered? Interesting how we iterate so often, yet are so concrete in our conclusions about improvements to our own governance.

[mola]

I think because we can't afford to 'break things' with governance so we prefer not to 'move fast'. Seems like good thinking...