|
|
|
|
|
by hexane360
2662 days ago
|
|
Your result is correct but your explanation is all kinds of wrong. First, shorter wavelength waves have higher energy. Second, amplitude doesn't cause the difference here. Even if you needed 1000W of bass to get the same effect as 10W of treble, 50% attenuation of bass would sound the same as 50% attenuation of treble. The real difference is that waves are attenuated much more by objects larger than their wavelength. |
|
And no, the real difference isn't that waves are attenuated much more by objects larger than their wavelengths. A 200m^2 sheet of paper will still attenuate treble and be completely transparent to bass.
The real difference is that bass damping requires a combination of size, raw mass, and permeability.
It's true that a tiny stick of a bass-damping material will do nothing to stop bass, but it's also true that giant bass traps - like the ones used in studios - will stop treble dead, but their effectiveness at bass frequencies depends entirely on size, thickness, and the material they're made of.
A concrete wall has plenty of mass but no permeability, so it's a good reflector at most frequencies. Bass traps use permeable materials like mineral fibre which have no effect in thin slices, but they're made thick enough to provide enough mass to damp the pressure oscillations.