Yea. The entire argument appears to be a single anecdote about some guy's dog acting really upset after biting his hand.
Quoting the article:
> For the longest time, science has depicted animals as stimulus-response machines while declaring their inner lives barren. This has helped us sustain our customary “anthropodenial”: the denial that we are animals. We like to see ourselves as special, but whatever the difference between humans and animals may be, it is unlikely to be found in the emotional domain.
Isn't this just a strawman in service to an applause light?
Quoting the article:
> For the longest time, science has depicted animals as stimulus-response machines while declaring their inner lives barren. This has helped us sustain our customary “anthropodenial”: the denial that we are animals. We like to see ourselves as special, but whatever the difference between humans and animals may be, it is unlikely to be found in the emotional domain.
Isn't this just a strawman in service to an applause light?