|
|
|
|
|
by randartie
2657 days ago
|
|
0) Initialize set X to contain every word. 1) Y = set of words in every definition of the words in set X 2) X = Y - X (all words in Y that are not in X) 3) Repeat from 1 if the set of words in X has changed Does that reduce all words down to the actual minimal set of words required to define other ones? Since you can build upwards from the resulting set X to get the original set of words. Also, this reminds me of the knapsack problem a little bit (for example what is the minimum set of coins required to be able to make $X). |
|