[m00natic]

So where's Haskell's advanced object system or the restart/condition system that Common Lisp has? Even its performance is hardly on par with CL for all the flexibility of the latter.

[tuukkah]

I'm not saying it has everything that Common Lisp has - it's different.

[agumonkey]

the world needs less objects, you know the koan `objects or closures: yes`

[naasking]

> So where's Haskell's advanced object system

Doesn't need one.

> restart/condition system that Common Lisp has

Utility is questionable, but you could build one in the continuation monad.